Rapid and sensitive diagnosis of human adenovirus infections by a generic polymerase chain reaction

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0934(00)00269-XGet rights and content

Abstract

A new adenovirus specific nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method is described. It was designed inside the hexon protein gene of the adenovirus genome, and was able to detect DNA of all 47 human adenovirus types in a wide range of clinical samples. A sensitive internal control system able to assure proper analytical conditions for the amplification of as few as 100 molecules of a heterologous DNA was included to avoid false negative results. Sensitivity was estimated at about 10 molecules per tube of a plasmid containing an insert of the first amplification product. The method was able to detect adenovirus infection in 31/43 conjunctival scrapings from patients with acute kerato conjunctivitis 10/40 nasopharyngeal aspirates from patients admitted to hospital with acute respiratory disease and 2/26 urine samples from patients with haemorrhagic cystitis with better sensitivity than cell culture or rapid diagnosis by antigen detection by immunofluorescence (IF) in the case of respiratory specimens. Only two of 17 stools positive for a group F adenovirus specific latex immunoassay were PCR negative. The internal control system avoided a false negative result on another two stool samples. In conclusion, the method described below was shown to be useful for rapid diagnosis of adenovirus infections with higher sensitivity than antigen detection by IF.

Introduction

Human adenoviruses are a major cause of different clinical syndromes including gastroenteritis, respiratory disease, conjunctivitis, haemorrhagic cystitis and exanthema (Horwitz, 1996). They comprise 47 different types grouped in seven groups (A, B1, B2, C, D, E, F). Correlation between viral type or group and organ tropism is partial (Horwitz, 1996).

Although viral isolation is the gold standard for direct detection of adenovirus, it often results in a delay of several days or weeks before the results are available (Krisher and Menegus, 1987, Mahafzah and Landry, 1989) and, therefore, is not useful for making therapeutic decisions. Serology is also slow as a result of the requirement for convalescent sera (Thiele et al., 1989). Direct antigen detection methods based on enzyme immune assay (de Paiva et al., 1992, Grondahl et al., 1999, Nakagawa et al., 1995, Rabalais et al., 1992), immunofluorescence (IF) (de Paiva et al., 1992, Freymuth et al., 1998, Mahafzah and Landry, 1989, Rabalais et al., 1992, Shaw et al., 1995, Torres and Vicente, 1992, Trabelsi et al., 1992), or specific latex agglutination (Dahling et al., 1993, Trabelsi et al., 1992) are used widely for rapid diagnosis of adenovirus infections; however, some of these techniques are less sensitive than cell culture (Torres and Vicente, 1992).

Genome amplification techniques based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) provide a rapid and sensitive alternative for adenovirus detection in clinical samples. These techniques have been applied either to detect all adenovirus types (Allard et al., 1992, Dalapathy et al., 1998, Flomenberg et al., 1997, Hierholzer et al., 1993, Jackson et al., 1996, Kidd et al., 1996, Kinchington et al., 1994, Kuwano et al., 1997, Lawler et al., 1994, Matsuse et al., 1994, Morris et al., 1995, Morris et al., 1996, Puig et al., 1994, Raty et al., 1999, Saitoh et al., 1996, Turner et al., 1993), or for the specific detection of some adenoviruses (Pring Akerblom and Adrian, 1994, Pring Akerblom et al., 1997, Tiemessen and Nel, 1996). DNA polymerase inhibitors are frequent in clinical samples and can be the cause of false negative results despite the high sensitivity of PCR, specially when urine or faecal samples are involved (Chernesky et al., 1997, Glimaker et al., 1992) but also with conjunctival swabs (Dalapathy et al., 1998). This can be avoided using internal control systems to monitor the reaction conditions in each individual tube.

In the present report, a new nested PCR method is described which is able to detect all 47 adenovirus types in clinical samples with a sensitive internal control system valid to assure the quality of reaction conditions in each individual tube.

Section snippets

Viral strains

Reference strains of adenovirus types 1 to 47 were kindly supplied by Dr. Dean Erdman from the Centre of Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA). Wild adenovirus types 1, 3, 5 and 19, influeza B virus, parainfluenza 1 virus, herpes, simplex 1 virus, varicella zoster virus, syncytial respiratory virus and parvovirus B19 strains were obtained from the Centro Nacional de Microbiologia (Majadahonda, Spain) archives.

Clinical samples

135 clinical samples distributed as follows: Group 1 included 43 conjunctival

Viral isolates

PCR products of the expected size were obtained for all 47 adenovirus serotype reference strains as well as for all wild isolates. Sensitivity showed optimal in a wide range of chemical conditions: Cl2Mg concentration between 2 and 6 mM, dnTp from 200 to 1000 μM and primers from 0.2 to 1 μM. Denaturation temperatures showed optimal from 92 to 95°C and annealing temperatures between 50 and 60°C. No amplification was obtained with other viruses. Serial dilution experiments with a type 1 wild

Discussion

The nested PCR described above was shown to be able to detect all 47 adenovirus serotypes with high sensitivity. Only three of the published PCR techniques (Hierholzer et al., 1993, Kidd et al., 1996, Puig et al., 1994) have been shown to detect all 47 serotypes with different sensitivity depending on the serotype. The sensitivity of the method was calculated only for adenovirus 1, which is the one showing more mismatches with primer sequences (Fig. 1). Consequently, a higher sensitivity should

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr Dean Erdman from the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA) for supplying adenovirus reference strains and for serotyping of wild adenovirus isolates. The authors also thank technicians Ana Castellanos, Soledad Carlos, Nieves Cruz, Domingo Estévez, Concepcion Hoyas, Manuela López, Paloma Lucas, lnés Parera and Manuel Vera for their work on routine diagnosis, which has been the source of the clinical samples selected for this work. This work was developed

References (40)

  • C.B. Shaw et al.

    Incidence of adenovirus and respiratory syncytial virus in chronic otitis media with effusion using the polymerase chain reaction

    Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg.

    (1995)
  • A. Tenorio et al.

    Detection and typing of human herpesviruses by multiplex polymerase chain reaction

    J. Virol. Meth.

    (1993)
  • G.M. Thiele et al.

    Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting antibodies in sera of patients with adenovirus infection

    J. Virol. Meth.

    (1989)
  • C.T. Tiemessen et al.

    Detection and typing of subgroup F adenoviruses using the polymerase chain reaction

    J. Virol. Meth.

    (1996)
  • P.C. Turner et al.

    The polymerase chain reaction for detecting adenovirus DNA in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue obtained post mortem

    J. Infect.

    (1993)
  • J.C. Aguilar et al.

    Detection and identification of human parainfluenza viruses 1, 2, 3, and 4 in clinical samples of pediatric patients by multiplex reverse transcription-PCR

    J. Clin. Microbiol.

    (2000)
  • A. Allard et al.

    Detection of adenoviruses in stools from healthy persons and patients with diarrhea by two-step polymerase chain reaction

    J. Med. Virol.

    (1992)
  • T.M. de Paiva et al.

    Comparative study of adenoviruses with monoclonal antibodies

    Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao. Paulo.

    (1992)
  • P. Flomenberg et al.

    Detection of adenovirus DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by polymerase chain reaction assay

    J. Med. Virol.

    (1997)
  • F. Freymuth et al.

    (Etiology and diagnostic of viral bronchopneumonias) Etiologie et diagnostic des bronchopneumopathies virales

    Ann. Biol. Clin. Paris.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (83)

    • Enteric Adenoviruses

      2012, Hunter's Tropical Medicine and Emerging Infectious Disease: Ninth Edition
    • Etiology and epidemiology of viral pneumonia among hospitalized children in rural mozambique: A malaria endemic area with high prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus

      2011, Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      RSV A and B, and Flu A and B viruses were detected by a multiplex reverse transcription (RT)-PCR (adapted version of the multiplex RT-heminested-PCR) described by Bellau-Pujol et al.22 Amplified products obtained in the RT-PCR were digested using specific restriction enzymes (Table, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/INF/A572, shows restriction enzymes used and digestion patterns). PIV 1, PIV 2, PIV 3, PIV 4AB, RV, and EV were detected using a multiplex RT-nested-PCR described by Coiras et al.23 ADV was detected using primers described by Avellon et al24 with PCR-adapted conditions.25 hMPV were detected using a heminested-PCR described by López-Huertas et al.26 Positive controls were included in each PCR assay.

    • Adenoviruses

      2022, Manual of Molecular and Clinical Laboratory Immunology: 7th edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text