Risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma in patients with nonfamilial atypical nevi from a pigmented lesions clinic☆,☆☆
Section snippets
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Since the start of the PLC in 1982, patients with AN were photographed during yearly follow-up. Not only total body slides but also detail slides of clinical AN were made. Of this photographed group all patients with at least 1 clinically suspected (or histologically verified) AN and a negative family history of melanoma (the “sporadic” types A, B, and C) were selected, 213 in number. Patients were included for analysis of melanoma risk from the moment they reached the age of 16. Patients
Composition of the study group
The group of 195 patients participating in the study was made up of 98 (50.3%) male patients and 97 (49.7%) female patients. Of 127 patients (65%) the diagnosis of AN had been verified by histology on earlier occasions. The mean age at entry was 29 years (range 16 to 66). Male patients were on average 5 years older than female patients at the time of their first visit to the PLC (mean age resp. 31.0, SD 10.5 vs 25.7, SD 9.2; t test 3.71, 193 degrees of freedom, P < .001). Of the 195 invited
DISCUSSION
In a retrospective follow-up study of patients attending a PLC in a university hospital in the Netherlands, patients with nonfamilial AN (Kraemer types A, B, and C) were found to be at increased risk of experiencing invasive cutaneous malignant melanoma. We found a relative risk of 41 compared with the general Dutch population for Kraemer groups A, B, and C. For patients without a personal and family history of malignant melanoma (Kraemer groups A and B) a relative risk of 37 was found. These
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to Viña Snijders for a critical reading of the manuscript.
References (35)
- et al.
Personal risk factor chart for cutaneous melanoma
Lancet
(1989) - et al.
Independence of dysplastic nevi from total nevi in determining risk for nonfamilial melanoma
Prev Med
(1988) - et al.
Prevalence of dysplastic nevi in a community practice [letter]
Lancet
(1984) - et al.
How common is the atypical mole syndrome phenotype in apparently sporadic melanoma?
J Am Acad Dermatol
(1993) - et al.
The dysplastic melanocytic nevus: a prevalent lesion that correlates poorly with clinical phenotype
J Am Acad Dermatol
(1989) - et al.
Dysplastic nevi and cutaneous melanoma risk
Lancet
(1983) - et al.
Accelerated detection with prospective surveillance for cutaneous malignant melanoma in high-risk groups
Lancet
(1993) - et al.
The melanoma epidemic: more apparent than real?
Mayo Clin Proc
(1997) - et al.
Discordance in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanoma and melanocytic nevi between expert pathologists
Hum Pathol
(1996) - et al.
Number of melanocytic nevi as a major risk factor for malignant melanoma
J Am Acad Dermatol
(1987)
Dysplastic nevi as risk markers of sporadic (non-familial) melanoma
Arch Dermatol
Marker and relative risk in a German population for developing malignant melanoma
Int J Dermatol
Common and dysplastic naevi as risk factors for cutaneous malignant melanoma in a Swedish population
Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh)
Origin of familial malignant melanomas from heritable melanocytic lesions
Arch Dermatol
Familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome
J Med Genet
Precursor lesions in familial melanoma
Semin Oncol
Dysplastic nevus syndrome: a phenotypic association of sporadic cutaneous melanoma
Cancer
Cited by (25)
Perioral Lesions and Dermatoses
2014, Dental Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Multiple studies over the past 30 years show that the risk of melanoma is increased by 20% for those who ever used indoor tanning.119 Acquired melanocytic nevi are important markers for the risk of melanoma development, with the total number of melanocytic nevi on the whole body being the most important independent risk factor.124,125 Additionally, the presence of dysplastic nevi is an additional independent risk factor for the development of melanoma.126
Risk Factors for the Development of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma
2012, Dermatologic ClinicsCitation Excerpt :Acquired melanocytic nevi are important markers for the risk of melanoma development. The total number of melanocytic nevi on the whole body is the most important independent risk factor for melanoma, and the risk for melanoma development increases almost linearly with increased numbers of melanocytic nevi.22 Presence of dysplastic nevi is an additional independent risk factor for the development of melanoma.
Childhood melanoma
2009, Clinics in DermatologyCitation Excerpt :Reports of CDK4 mutation-related familial melanoma are fewer than CDKN2A cases,46,51-53 with some suggesting that CDK4 mutations may be a susceptibility gene that has a minor role in familial melanoma and dysplastic nevi.54,55 Patients with dysplastic nevus syndrome or sporadic dysplastic nevi are at increased risk for melanoma.39,56 The total number of nevi and number of atypical nevi are independent risk factors for melanoma.57-65
Lentigines, nevi, and melanomas
2009, Weedon's Skin Pathology: Third EditionCutaneous ultraviolet exposure and its relationship to the development of skin cancer
2008, Journal of the American Academy of DermatologyCitation Excerpt :The development of potential precursors to invasive skin cancer such as actinic keratoses and dysplastic nevi has been shown to be inhibited by the regular use of sunscreen.29-31 Personal nevus count is related to the risk of developing melanoma.32 Lower nevus counts were found in children who regularly used sunscreens than those who did not, suggesting that sun protection early in life might lower subsequent melanoma risk.33
Indications for excision of nevi and melanoma diagnosed in a pediatric surgical unit
2007, Journal of Pediatric SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Patients with atypical nevi are demonstrated to be at increased risk for development of melanoma. This risk is higher in familial atypical nevi subgroups, but it has been found even in patients with nonfamilial atypical nevi [27]. In fact, features of atypical nevi were the most frequent indication to surgery in our unit.