Elsevier

European Journal of Cancer

Volume 40, Issue 12, August 2004, Pages 1897-1903
European Journal of Cancer

E-Cadherin (CDH1) and p53 rather than SMAD4 and Caspase-10 germline mutations contribute to genetic predisposition in Portuguese gastric cancer patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2004.04.027Get rights and content

Abstract

Approximately 30% of all hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) families carry CDH1 germline mutations. The other two thirds remain genetically unexplained and are probably caused by alterations in other genes. Using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP)/sequencing, we screened 32 Portuguese families with a history of gastric cancer and 23 patients with early onset gastric cancer for CDH1 germline mutations. In probands negative for CDH1 mutations, we screened genes involved in hereditary cancer syndromes in which gastric cancer may be one of the component tumours, namely p53 (Li-Fraumeni Syndrome) and hMLH1 and hMSH2 (HNPCC). We also screened in these patients for mutations in Caspase-10, a gene inactivated in sporadic gastric cancer, and SMAD4, a gene whose inactivation in mice is associated with signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach. One of the families fulfilling the HDGC criteria harboured a CDH1 germline mutation, and one of the families with incomplete criteria harboured a p53 germline mutation. No mutations were identified in hMLH1 and hMSH2, and only sequence variants were found in SMAD4 and Caspase-10. The present work reports for the first time CDH1 germline mutations in Portuguese gastric cancer families, and highlights the need for p53 mutation screening in families lacking CDH1 germline mutations, in a country with one of the highest incidences of gastric cancer in the world. No evidence was found for a role of germline mutations in SMAD4 and Caspase-10 in families lacking CDH1 mutations.

Introduction

The incidence of gastric cancer has been decreasing in older patients, but in younger patients and cases with familial clustering the level remains stable [1]. Aggregation of gastric cancer within families is observed in approximately 10% of the cases [2], [3], but only 1–3% of gastric carcinomas arise as a result of inherited gastric cancer predisposition syndromes [4].

In 1999, clinical criteria for the hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) syndrome were defined by the International Gastric Cancer Linkage Consortium (IGCLC) [5]. However, gastric cancer may also be seen as part of the tumour spectrum in other inherited cancer predisposition syndromes, such as: hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC), Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP), Cowden syndrome and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) [6], [7], [8], [9], [10].

The presence of germline CDH1 mutations in affected family members was shown to be, the genetic defect responsible for a proportion of families with HDGC as first described by Guilford and collaborators in 1998 [11]. Approximately one third of families with an aggregation of gastric cancer, fulfilling the IGCLC criteria for HDGC studied so far, show germline CDH1 mutations in affected individuals (reviewed in [12]). Most of these families carry truncating mutations, whereas a small percentage carry missense mutations [12].

Approximately two thirds of HDGC families remain genetically unexplained. In kindred negative for CDH1 germline mutations, other genes are probably involved. In some inherited predisposition syndromes characterised by a higher incidence of gastric cancer, germline mutations of different tumour-related genes have been demonstrated to segregate with the disease. HNPCC occurs due to inactivating alterations of mismatch repair genes (MMR) leading to instability at short tandem repeat sequences – microsatellites – microsatellite instability (MSI), a typical molecular manifestation of MMR deficiency in the tumour tissue of HNPCC patients [13]. In approximately 70% of Li-Fraumeni kindred, which occasionally present with gastric cancer cases, germline mutations in p53 are found [14]. SMAD4 has been found to be inactivated in a percentage of PJS, and knockout studies revealed the presence of foci of signet-ring carcinoma cells in the stomach of SMAD4 heterozygous mice [15]. Each of the aforementioned genes, as well as genes found to be inactivated in sporadic gastric cancer (like Caspase-10 [16]), remain good candidates for familial gastric cancer.

We have selected a series of Portuguese families with a positive history of gastric cancer (n=32), and a series of Portuguese early onset gastric cancer patients (n=23) and screened all probands for CDH1 germline mutations. In probands negative for CDH1, we have screened the entire coding sequence and splice-sites of several candidate genes, namely SMAD4, Caspase-10 and the mutational hotspots corresponding to exons 5–8 of p53. Whenever tumour tissue was available, we performed MSI analysis, and in MSI-positive cases hMLH1 and hMSH2 coding sequences were studied to exclude HNPCC.

Section snippets

Patients

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the appropriate Ethics Committees and blood samples and family histories were obtained with informed consent. Thirty two families of Portuguese origin with a positive history of gastric cancer and 23 early onset gastric cancer patients (⩽45 years old) were studied (Table 1). Nine families fulfilled the IGCLC criteria for HDGC. Ten families had an index case with diffuse gastric cancer (FDGC). Three families had an index case with intestinal

Results

From the Portuguese families with an aggregation of gastric cancer, one out of 32 (3.1%) harboured a germline mutation in CDH1. This family (FGC#32) was one of the nine (11.1%) kindred that fulfilled the criteria for HDGC (Table 1, Table 2). The proband in this family was heterozygous for a missense mutation at position 1901 (C>T) in codon 634, leading to an amino acid substitution from Ala to Val (Fig. 1(a)). This germline mutation was identified in DNA isolated from paraffin-embedded normal

Discussion

We have collected a series of 55 patients of Portuguese origin which developed gastric cancer, either with a positive family history of gastric cancer or an early age of onset. The sole CDH1 germline mutation found was present in a family with HDGC. The CDH1 mutation found in family FGC#32 is a missense mutation (Ala634Val) and was identified in the 23 year old proband. This mutation was shown to harbour dramatic functional consequences in vitro [23]. Moreover, Vecsey-Semjen and colleagues [24]

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge all our colleagues who referred cases, and the patients and their families for generously participating in the research. This study was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal (Project POCTI/CBO/35374/2000; Project POCTI/MGI/35586/1999) and by Programa Operacional Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (POCTI), do QCA III.

References (30)

  • N.M. Lindor et al.

    The concise handbook of family cancer syndromes. Mayo familial cancer program

    J. Natl. Cancer Inst.

    (1998)
  • J.M. Varley

    Germline TP53 mutations and Li-Fraumeni syndrome

    Hum. Mutat.

    (2003)
  • H.F. Vasen et al.

    The risk of brain tumours in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)

    Int. J. Cancer

    (1996)
  • P. Guilford et al.

    E-cadherin germline mutations in familial gastric cancer

    Nature

    (1998)
  • C. Oliveira et al.

    Genetic screening for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer

    Expert Rev. Mol. Diagnos.

    (2003)
  • Cited by (90)

    • CDH1 mutations in gastric cancers are not associated with family history

      2020, Pathology Research and Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      We found that occurrence of CDH1 mutation was not significantly associated with family history. After the first report of germline CDH1 mutation in GC [38], various types of CDH1 mutations have been reported in HDGC or diffuse type GC by polymerase chain reaction and sequencing [3–7] aided with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification [8–11] or high-resolution melting analyses [12]. CDH1 germline mutations were identified in 10 % of FGC cases [10,11], 0∼19 % of HDGC cases [3–5,8] and 0∼8.9 % [5,4–7,9] of EOGC cases [6], as well as in 1.7 % of patients with sporadic GC [12].

    • Malignancies in immune deficiencies

      2020, Stiehm's Immune Deficiencies: Inborn Errors of Immunity
    • Phenotypic heterogeneity of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: report of a family with early-onset disease

      2018, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this report we highlight the variability of clinical, endoscopic, and histopathologic findings of HDGC in CDH1 carriers from the same family. The CDH1 germline pathogenic variant identified is a missense variant (Ala634Val), which has been previously observed in several unrelated families17-21 and is predicted to cause a truncated protein by cryptic splice-site activation.23 Its pathogenic nature has been proven by in silico prediction models and in vitro functional assays.24

    • Epidemiology and pathophysiology of malignancy in common variable immunodeficiency?

      2017, Allergologia et Immunopathologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      Mutations in a main tumour suppressor gene, tumour protein p53 (TP53) encoding for p53 protein, are one of the most common genetic variations in human cancers, and contribute to the complex network of molecular events leading to tumour formation.76 In numerous studies, defects in p53 have been reported in gastric cancer from Japan,77 Portugal76 and Germany.78 Zullo et al.54 hypothesised that p53 alterations can play a role in the gastric carcinogenesis of patients with CVID.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text