Elsevier

Human Pathology

Volume 36, Issue 6, June 2005, Pages 646-654
Human Pathology

Original contribution
Incidentally detected prostate cancer in cystoprostatectomies: pathological and morphometric comparison with clinically detected cancer in totally embedded specimens

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2005.03.018Get rights and content

Summary

There are limited data regarding the pathological features of incidentally detected prostate cancer. Examination of cystoprostatectomy specimens obtained during bladder cancer treatment affords a unique opportunity to examine incidentally detected prostate cancer and determine its relationship with clinically detected prostate cancer obtained during radical prostatectomy. We compared the pathological findings of incidentally detected prostate cancer in 132 consecutive cystoprostatectomy specimens from patients treated for bladder cancer with a consecutive series of 228 radical prostatectomy specimens from patients treated for prostate cancer. All specimens were totally embedded and whole-mounted. Karyometry was evaluated in select subsets of patients from the study groups. Incidentally detected cancer was found in 42% of cystoprostatectomy specimens, and the cancers were of lower Gleason score and lower pathological stage with fewer positive surgical margins than in clinically detected cancers in age-matched radical prostatectomies. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) was present in 82% of radical prostatectomy specimens, in 70% of cystoprostatectomies with incidentally detected prostate cancer, and in 54% of cystoprostatectomies without prostate cancer. Mean nuclear and nucleolar area was lower in incidentally detected cancer and PIN when compared with clinically detected cancer and PIN, respectively, similar to the results with proliferative indices. We conclude that incidentally detected cancer is less aggressive than clinically detected cancer.

Introduction

Prostate cancer is identified in 3 different settings: (1) clinically diagnosed by physical examination, laboratory tests, and/or symptoms (clinically detected cancer); (2) discovered when the prostate is removed incidentally (eg, during cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer) (incidentally detected cancer); or (3) discovered latently at autopsy without ever having caused symptoms during the person's lifetime (autopsy-detected cancer). The incidence of prostate cancer in each of these settings is different.

The lifetime risk of clinically detected prostate cancer is 9.5%, and the probability of dying from prostate cancer is 3%. The frequency of incidentally detected cancer is approximately 42% in men older than 50 years; the frequency of autopsy-detected cancer is similar or higher. Early diagnosis of lethal prostate cancer is a laudable goal, as is avoidance of unnecessary treatment, but current methods are inaccurate for making this determination. In no other malignancy is there such a vast reservoir of undetected cases that may never be clinically significant or cause death [1]; yet, we are unable to stratify significant and insignificant cancer.

Almost all clinical and morphological studies of prostate cancer have been made in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens, representing clinically detected cancer [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Currently, stage, surgical margin status, and Gleason score are the most commonly used predictors of outcome for patients with prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Removal of the prostate with the bladder during radical cystectomy for bladder cancer provides a unique opportunity to evaluate the clinical and morphological features of incidentally detected prostate cancer [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]. To our knowledge, there are no previous studies that compare the morphological, morphometric, and immunohistochemical features of benign prostate, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and cancer in cystoprostatectomy and radical prostatectomy specimens; this was the aim of the current study.

Section snippets

Morphology

The study group materials were obtained from the files of the Section of Pathological Anatomy and Histopathology of the Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy. A total of 360 consecutive prostate specimens were examined between March 1997 and June 2001 and consisted of the following:

  • One hundred thirty-two cystoprostatectomy specimens from men with urothelial carcinoma and no history or clinical evidence of prostate cancer before surgery. Mean patient age was 61 years (range,

Morphology

The majority (67%) of clinically detected cancers were pT2b and pT3a (32% and 35%, respectively) (Table 1). A total of 21% and 59% of cases had Gleason scores 6 and 7, respectively (Table 2). Positive margins were present in 52% of specimens, and regional lymph node metastases were present in 2% of cases.

Incidentally detected prostate cancer was present in 42% of cystoprostatectomy specimens. The majority (60%) was pT2a and 28% pT2b, with lower frequency in other pT categories (8% pT3a, 3%

Discussion

We found that 42% of totally sampled cystoprostatectomy specimens with bladder cancer also contained incidental prostate cancer. This result was identical to the overall mean frequency of incidentally detected prostate cancer in other series of cystoprostatectomy cases (range, 23%-68%) [1], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24] and similar to or slightly lower than the age-adjusted frequency of autopsy-detected prostate cancer (mean

Acknowledgments

This report was supported by grants from the Polytechnic University of the Marche Region (Ancona) Italy (M. S.) and the Italian Ministry of University and Scientific Research (R. M., 2003). The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Polytechnic University of the Marche Region (Ancona, Italy).

References (41)

  • M.H. Weinstein

    Digital image analysis of proliferative index: two distinct population of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in close proximity to the adenocarcinoma of the prostate

    Hum Pathol

    (1998)
  • E.L. Wiley et al.

    Risk of concurrent prostate cancer in cystoprostatectomy specimens is related to volume of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

    Urol

    (1997)
  • T.A. Stamey et al.

    Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer

    Cancer

    (1993)
  • D.G. Bostwick

    Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

    Curr Urol Rep

    (2000)
  • D.G. Bostwick et al.

    Diagnosis of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

    Scand J Urol Nephrol

    (2000)
  • R. Montironi et al.

    Morphological identification of the patterns of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and their importance

    J Clin Pathol

    (2000)
  • R. Montironi et al.

    Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer

    Panminerva Med

    (2000)
  • R. Montironi et al.

    Precancerous lesions and conditions of the prostate: from morphological and biological characterization to chemoprevention

    Ann N Y Acad Sci

    (2002)
  • F. Abbas et al.

    Incidental prostate cancer: the importance of complete prostatic removal at cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer

    Urol Int

    (2000)
  • F. Abbas et al.

    Incidental prostatic adenocarcinoma in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer

    Eur Urol

    (1996)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text