Regular Articles
A retrospective study comparing the individual modalities of triple assessment in the pre-operative diagnosis of invasive lobular breast carcinoma

https://doi.org/10.1053/ejso.2001.1236Get rights and content

Abstract

Aims: Early invasive lobular breast carcinoma (ILC) is associated with few symptoms and signs. The individual sensitivity of clinical examination, mammography, ultrasonography, cytology and core biopsy have each been reported to be of limited value. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of triple assessment in the pre-operative detection of patients identified to have ILC from their surgical pathology. Methods: Pure ILC was defined as tumours containing at least 90% lobular features. The triple assessment of 273 patients diagnosed primarily at our institution were reviewed. Results: 87.5% of women were symptomatic and 12.5% were screen detected. The mean patient age was 59 (range 30–81) years and the median tumour size was 26 (range 5–110) mm. The main mammographic abnormalities were a spiculated lesion (33.3%), an ill-defined mass (33.3%) or architectural distortion (23.5%). The sensitivities for detecting ILC of each modality were: clinical examination (76.6%), mammography (79.8%), ultrasound examination (93.9%), fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) (60.5%) and core biopsy (90.8%). Combining the three modalities of clinical examination, imaging and cyto/pathology increased the pre-operative detection rate of ILC. Conclusion: Triple assessment is useful in the diagnosis of ILC. As the features of ILC may be subtle, a high index of suspicion is required to facilitate early diagnosis.

References (24)

  • V Martinez et al.

    Invasive carcinoma of the breast: incidence and variants

    Histopathol

    (1979)
  • Page, DL, Anderson, TJ, Sakamoto, G, Infiltrating carcinoma: major histological types, In Page DL, Anderson TJ (eds)....
  • M Le Gal et al.

    Mammographic features of 455 invasive lobular carcinoma

    Radiol

    (1992)
  • CP Paramagul et al.

    Invasive lobular carcinoma: sonographic appearance and role of sonography in improving diagnostic sensitivity

    Radiol

    (1995)
  • GP Sadler et al.

    Role of fine-needle aspiration cytology and needle-core biopsy in the diagnosis of lobular carcinoma of the breast

    Br J Surg

    (1994)
  • IA Robinson et al.

    Lobular carcinoma of the breast: cytological features supporting the diagnosis of lobular cancer

    Diag Cytopathol

    (1995)
  • C Leach et al.

    Cytodiagnosis of classical lobular carcinoma and its variants

    Acta Cytol

    (1992)
  • G Kruzen et al.

    Aspiration biopsy cytology, mammography, and clinical exploration: a modern set-up in diagnosis of tumours of the breast

    Acta Cytol

    (1996)
  • JT Vetto et al.

    Diagnosis of palpable breast lesions in younger women by the modified triple test is accurate and cost-effective

    Arch Surg

    (1996)
  • Pinder, SE, Elston, CW, Ellis, IO, Invasive carcinoma – usual histological types, In Elston CW, Ellis IO (eds)....
  • Cytology Sub-Group of the National Coordinating Committee for Breast Cancer Screening Pathology, Guidelines for...
  • NA Roche et al.

    Assessment of a scoring system for breast imaging

    Br J Surg

    (1997)
  • Cited by (27)

    • Locally advanced invasive lobular carcinoma presenting as skin erythema, with multimodality imaging correlation

      2022, Radiology Case Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Anatomic structures are preserved during early tumor growth and the associated desmoplastic reaction, if present at all, is often far less prominent than that seen with invasive ductal carcinomas [6]. Therefore, ILC often fails to form a palpable mass and is challenging to detect on clinical exam [7]. These growth characteristics result in lower mammographic and sonographic sensitivities for detection of ILC compared to IDC, as well as potential underestimation of ILC size which may hamper the surgeon's ability to obtain negative margins [6,8,9].

    • Preoperative cytological and histological diagnosis of breast lesions: A critical review

      2010, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      As such, many centres prefer CNB to individualize the choice to perform axillary staging. Second, CNB can better distinguish invasive lobular from invasive ductal carcinoma than FNA as the infiltrating pattern is characteristic on histology and epithelial markers can confirm the diagnosis.53,54 Preoperative knowledge of specific tumour histology is fundamental to planning the extent of surgery since lobular carcinoma carries an increased risk of positive lumpectomy margins and synchronous contralateral disease.55,56

    • The Effectiveness of MR Imaging in the Assessment of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast

      2010, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      There is no association of ILC with microcalcifications, and the tumors are often isodense to fibroglandular tissue.22,25,27,31,32 Common descriptors include ill-defined mass (7%–33%),23,26,29 architectural distortion (10%–24%),23,26–29 and asymmetry (4%–14%).23,26 The wide ranges reported probably reflect interreader variability of the descriptive terminology.

    • Lobular breast carcinoma and its variants

      2010, Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Another problem related to ILC diagnosis is cellular uniformity, particularly in low-grade lesions, and the lack of stromal response, which create a challenge for cytologic diagnosis on fine needle aspiration or histologic diagnosis on NCB. The reported failure rates for detection of ILC on fine needle aspiration range from 4% to 40% depending on the series.64-66 This high rate usually is attributed to inadequate sampling or poor cellularity and to difficulties in interpretation because of the presence of only mild atypia and more frequent small cells.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    f1

    Correspondence to: Mr G. P. H. Gui, Consultant Breast Surgeon, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, 203 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK. Fax: +44 (0) 7808 2673; E-mail: [email protected]

    View full text