Elsevier

The Breast

Volume 8, Issue 6, December 1999, Pages 339-342
The Breast

Original Article
Radial scar and carcinoma of the breast: microscopic findings in 32 cases

https://doi.org/10.1054/brst.1999.0081Get rights and content

Abstract

We retrospectively reviewed the microscopic findings in 32 histologically confirmed radial scars in 31 women diagnosed in our unit during 1994–1998. The median age at diagnosis was 53 years (range 47–63 years). Thirty–one (97%) of 32 lesions presented as screen detected mammographic abnormalities (28 stellate lesions, 2 microcalcifications and only 1 architectural distortion). One lesion presented as a palpable breast mass. Stereotactic or ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was performed in 28 cases. Cytological analysis of FNAs revealed malignant cells (C5) in 8 (29%) cases, highly suspicious cells (C4) in 3 (11%) cases, atypical benign cells (C3) in 7 (25%) cases and benign epithelial cells (C2) in 10 (35%) cases.

All non-palpable lesions were surgically excised following wire localization. Histological examination of the breast specimens (mean weight = 16 g) demonstrated, in addition to a radial scar, 6 invasive carcinomas (2 infiltrating ductal, 2 tubular, 1 mixed ductal/lobular and 1 secretory carcinoma) and 4 ductal carcinoma in situ lesions (2 high grade, 1 high grade with micro-invasion and 1 low grade) arising in the radial scar. Of the remaining cases the radial scar was associated with atypical epithelial hyperplasia in 2 cases and regular epithelial hyperplasia in 17 cases (4 florid and 13 mild to moderate). In the 10 cases associated with malignancy, 9 had FNAC and was reported as malignant (C5) in 6 (67%) cases, highly suspicious (C4) in 2 (22%) cases and atypical (C3) in 1 (11%). False positive FNAC (C5) occurred in two patients, one of whom presented with pleomorphic microcalcifications suggestive of ductal carcinoma in situ. This patient was treated with a wire guided segmental mastectomy. All invasive tumours were less than 20 mm in size (T1) and of these 4 were grade I and 2 were grade II. Axillary dissection was performed in 4 patients none of whom had axillary node metastases.

Our study demonstrates a significant incidence of malignancy associated with radial scars (31%) suggesting that radial scars may be premalignant lesions. This is supported by detecting various stages of mammary carcinogenesis (atypical epithelial hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, and early invasive malignancy) in these lesions. Fine needle aspiration cytology seems to be unreliable in the diagnosis of radial scar associated malignancy (67% sensitivity and 91% specificity). Stellate lesions, therefore, should be excised to obtain an histological diagnosis regardless of cytological findings. Further studies examining the biology of radial scars are required.

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (38)

  • Radial scar of the breast: Is it possible to avoid surgery?

    2017, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The clinical management of RS is currently controversial. Although a recent study demonstrated that there is no evidence to suggest that RS, even larger than 10 mm, have any greater risk of developing cancer after excision than the general population,16 a significant number of observations show the opposite and conclude that there are a possible association with malignancy.8,17–22 The reason for this association remains uncertain.

  • Surgical excision outcome after radial scar without atypical proliferative lesion on breast core needle biopsy: A single institutional analysis

    2016, Annals of Diagnostic Pathology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The radiologic appearance of RS overlaps that of invasive carcinoma (IC), and it poses a challenge to radiologists [3-6]. RS has been found to be associated with both benign proliferative lesions and atypical/malignant proliferative lesions [7-12]. The management of patients with RS detected on image-guided core needle biopsies (CNBs) is still a matter of debate because the data from previous studies are conflicting in regard to whether these lesions are independent risk factors for malignancy [7-30].

  • Pathologic findings of follow-up surgical excision for radial scar on breast core needle biopsy

    2016, Human Pathology
    Citation Excerpt :

    RS has been associated with both benign proliferative lesions (usually ductal hyperplasia) and atypical/malignant lesions with broad and overlapping ranges of frequency [3–8]. Although various studies have investigated the association between RS and breast cancers, data from the literature are still conflicting in regard to whether these lesions are independent risk factors for malignancy or a marker of higher risk [3–26]. Some studies also investigated whether surgical excision is necessary for patients with RS identified on CNB and attributed the associated risk to accompanying proliferative lesions, especially those with atypia [12,13,15,16].

  • Long term follow-up and risk of breast cancer after a radial scar or complex sclerosing lesion has been identified in a benign open breast biopsy

    2011, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The main clinical significance of radial scars is their possible association with the development of breast cancer. Several observations have led to this suggestion including similar mammographic and histological appearances3–7; the finding of carcinomas in radial scars1,5,8–16; and the association with other forms of benign proliferative disease known to predispose to the development of breast cancer.17–20 Various studies have investigated the possible association between radial scars and breast cancer, with conflicting results.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text