Skip to main content
Log in

Accuracy of 11-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Core Biopsy of Mammographic Breast Lesions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Image-guided percutaneous biopsy has largely replaced excisional biopsy of mammographic lesions. Vacuum-assisted core biopsy has improved sampling of such lesions. The objectives of this study were to define the accuracy of the vacuum-assisted 11-gauge stereotactic core biopsy in sampling of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to define histologic and mammographic features of target lesions, which predict sampling errors.

Methods: Between October 1996 and March 2000, 1341 patients underwent stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy. Patients with ADH or DCIS were encouraged to undergo excisional biopsy.

Results: Surgical excision of 37 ADH lesions revealed 5 missed DCIS lesions and 1 missed invasive cancer. Twelve of 91 DCIS lesions were upstaged to invasive cancer upon excision. The underestimation rate was highest in patients with DCIS when the target lesion for biopsy was a zone of calcifications >1.5 cm. No correlation existed between the histologic features of DCIS lesions diagnosed by stereotactic biopsy and the presence of infiltrating disease on excision.

Conclusions: Vacuum-assisted 11-gauge stereotactic core biopsy understages 13.2% and 13.5% of DCIS and ADH lesions, respectively. In patients with DCIS found by stereotactic biopsy, a target zone of calcifications >1.5 cm is associated with a higher underestimation rate of infiltrating disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Parker SL, Davis KJ, Wingo PA, Reis LA, Heath CW Jr. Cancer statistics by race and ethnicity. Ca Cancer J Clin 2001; 51: 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Shepard MJ, Finkelstein SJ, Marzoni FA Jr. Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology 1994; 193: 91–5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jackman RJ, Parker SH, Evans III WP, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 2001; 218: 497–502.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burbank F, Parker SH, Fogarty TJ. Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the mammotome. Am Surg 1996; 62: 738–44.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burbank F, Forcier N. Tissue marking clip for stereotactic breast biopsy: initial placement accuracy, long-term stability, and usefulness as a guide for wire localization. Radiology 1997; 205: 407–15.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA JR, Shepard MJ, Finkelstein SJ. Stereotactic, automated, large core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 1999; 210: 799–805.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liberman L, LaTrenta LR, Van Zee KJ, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Dershaw DD. Stereotactic core biopsy of calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy. Radiology 1997; 203: 673–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic breast biopsy: improved reliability with 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 1997; 204: 485–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 1997; 202: 843–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. JAMA 1999; 281: 1638–41.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Burak WE, Owens KE, Tighe M, et al. Vacuum-assisted stereotacric breast biopsy: histologic underestimation of malignant lesions. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 700–3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maganini RO, Klem DA, Huston BJ, et al. Upgrade rate of core biopsy-determined atypical ductal hyperplasia by open excisional biopsy. Am J Surg 2001; 182: 355–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brem RF, Schoonjans JM, Goodman SN, et al. Nonpalpable breast cancer: percutaneous dignosis with 11- and 8-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy device. Radiology 2001; 219: 793–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 2001; 218: 497–502.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Rados MS. Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast. A long-term follow-up study. Cancer 1985; 55: 2698–2708.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tavassoli Fa, Norris HJ. A comparison of the results of long-term follow up for atypical hyperplasia and intraductal hyperplasia of the breast. Cancer 1990; 65: 518–29.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Glassman JR, et al. Analysis of cancers not diagnosed at stereotactic core breast biopsy. Radiology 1997; 203: 151–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Tavaassoli FA, et al. Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of ductal proliferative breast lesions using standardized criteria. Am J Surg Pathol 1992; 16: 1133–43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Pandelidis MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pandelidis, S., Heilman, D., Jones, D. et al. Accuracy of 11-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Core Biopsy of Mammographic Breast Lesions. Ann Surg Oncol 10, 43–47 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2003.05.004

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2003.05.004

Key Words

Navigation