Chest
Cholesterol in Pleural Effusions: A Diagnostic Aid
Section snippets
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Seventy pleural effusions from 70 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital were studied prospectively between August, 1984 and May, 1985.
Diagnosis of pleural effusion was established by physical examination, chest x-ray film and in several cases by ultrasound study. In small effusions, an ultrasound-guided thoracocentesis was performed.
The patients were placed in four different diagnostic groups: 1) transudates in congestive heart failure/other transudates (CHF/OTH TRANS); 2) exudates of
GROUP 1
Congestive heart failure was determined by an enlarged heart, x-ray signs of congested lungs, peripheral edema, response to treatment of CHF, and/or absence of malignancy or pulmonary infiltrates.
Liver cirrhosis was diagnosed by clear evidence of liver cirrhosis in the absence of heart failure, malignancy or pulmonary infiltrates, and responsiveness to diuretic treatment.
Nephrosis, hypalbuminemia and other causes of transudates were not observed.
GROUP 2
Exudates of a malignant origin fit the following criteria: histologic proof of a malignant tumor; cytologic and/or histologic evidence of a malignant pleural effusion; absence of diseases causing transudates; and no pulmonary infiltrates.
GROUP 3
Pleuropneumonia appeared with fever, pulmonary infiltrates, responsiveness to antibiotic treatment, and the absence of malignancy or diseases causing transudates.
Tuberculosis was diagnosed by granulomas on pleural biopsy and/ or positive pleural fluid cultures.
GROUP 4
Patients with effusions meeting diagnostic criteria of more than one of the previous groups (eg, CHF and pleuropneumonia) or with pleural effusions of obscure origin fell into the fourth diagnostic group.
No chylous or traumatic effusions were observed.
Samples of venous blood and pleural fluid were usually obtained on the same day shortly after hospital admission. Only the results of the first thoracocentesis were considered.
Protein level was measured by the biuret method (Boehringer-Mannheim).
RESULTS
Classification of the 70 effusions is shown in Table 1. Group 4 includes patients with CHF and carcinoma (two cases), CHF and pleuropneumonia (two cases), probable carcinoma and pleuropneumonia (one case), non-Hodgkin lymphoma and CHF (one case), uremia and CHF (one case), and probable pulmonary infarction (one case).
Table 2 summarizes cytopathologic and histologic findings in the group with exudates of malignant origin. Case 10 was a patient with advanced metastatic lung cancer with extensive
DISCUSSION
Early and decisive evidence of the transudative or exudative nature of a pleural effusion may be of considerable clinical value and is often used as a basis for further diagnostic procedures and therapeutic considerations. No single chemical test or series of tests has yet proved to be completely reliable. Hence, the search for diagnostic improvements is kept alive.
It has long been known that cholesterol is constantly found in all pleural fluids.8 Nevertheless, we were not able to find
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank Professor Berger (Institute of Biostatistics, University of Hamburg) for statistical guidance; Professor Saeger (Department of Pathology, Marienkrankenhaus, Hamburg) for cytopathologic and histologic studies; and Professor Ostendorf (Director, First Medical Department, Marienkrankenhaus, Hamburg) for continuous and critical revision of the manuscript. The authors are indebted to Ms. M. Petersen for her technical assistance and for preparation of the manuscript.
References (0)
Cited by (115)
Analysis of pleural liquid: First-line orientation
2013, Revue des Maladies Respiratoires ActualitesThe Light Criteria: The Beginning and Why they are Useful 40 Years Later
2013, Clinics in Chest MedicineThe use of non-routine pleural fluid analysis in the diagnosis of pleural effusion
2010, Respiratory MedicineCitation Excerpt :Hamm et al. examined the pleural fluid in a series of patients and found that an optimal cut-off for the correct differentiation of the effusions was 60 mg/dl. Using this cut-off they found that 5% of cases were incorrectly classified.12 Yilmaz et al. analysed the pleural fluid in 255 patients and found that using a cut-off of 60 mg/dl had an accuracy rate of 95.7% with a sensitivity and specificity of 95.3% and 96.2% respectively.13
Manuscript received September 15; revision accepted January 13.