Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 21, 2011

Influence of short-term venous stasis on clinical chemistry testing

  • Giuseppe Lippi , Gian Luca Salvagno , Martina Montagnana , Giorgio Brocco and Gian Cesare Guidi

Abstract

Control and standardization of preanalytical variability is a critical factor for achieving accuracy and precision in laboratory testing. Although venous stasis from tourniquet placement during venepuncture should be minimized, as it has been claimed to account for spurious and significant variations for several analytes in plasma, there is controversy surrounding its real impact on laboratory testing. The aim of the present study was the investigation of the influence of short-term venous stasis on routine biochemical testing, by measuring the plasma concentration of 12 common analytes, including proteins, protein-bound substances, enzymes and electrolytes, in plasma specimens collected either without venous stasis or following the application of standardized external pressure of 60mm Hg using a sphygmomanometer for 1 and 3min. Although the overall correlation between measures was acceptable, the pattern of change was mostly dependent on the length of stasis, size and protein-binding characteristics of the analytes, achieving clinical significance for albumin, calcium and potassium after 1-min stasis, and alanine aminotransferase, albumin, calcium, chloride, total cholesterol, glucose and potassium after 3-min stasis. Statistically significant differences could be observed in seven (alanine aminotransferase, albumin, calcium, total cholesterol, creatine kinase, iron and potassium) and ten (alanine aminotransferase, albumin, calcium, chloride, total cholesterol, creatine kinase, creatinine, glucose, iron and potassium) out of the 12 analytes tested, after 1- and 3-min venous stasis, respectively. The most clinically significant changes from standard venepuncture, when compared to the current analytical quality specifications for desirable bias, occurred for potassium (1-min stasis, −2.8%; 3-min stasis, −4.8%, both p<0.001), calcium (1-min stasis, +1.6%, p<0.05; 3-min stasis, +3.6%, p<0.001) and albumin (1-min stasis, +3.5%; 3-min stasis, +8.6%, both p<0.001). As most of these effects are dependent on the stasis time during venepuncture and biochemical or physiological characteristics of the analyte, these variations could likely be anticipated, allowing the most appropriate preventive measures to be adopted.


Corresponding author: Prof. Giuseppe Lippi, MD, Istituto di Chimica e Microscopia Clinica, Dipartimento di Scienze Morfologico-Biomediche, Università degli Studi di Verona, Ospedale Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Piazzale Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy Phone: +39-045-8074516, Fax: +39-045-8201889,

References

1. Bonini PA, Plebani M, Ceriotti F, Francesca Rubboli F. Errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem 2002; 48: 691–8. 10.1093/clinchem/48.5.691Search in Google Scholar

2. Junge B, Hoffmeister H, Feddersen HM, Rocker L. Standardisation of obtaining blood samples: influence of tourniquet application on 33 constituents of blood and serum. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1978; 103: 260–5. 10.1055/s-0028-1104418Search in Google Scholar

3. Renoe BW, McDonald JM, Ladenson JH. The effects of stasis with and without exercise on free calcium, various cations, and related parameters. Clin Chim Acta 1980; 103: 91–100. 10.1016/0009-8981(80)90234-XSearch in Google Scholar

4. McNair P, Nielsen SL, Christiansen C, Axelsson C. Gross errors made by routine blood sampling from two sites using a tourniquet applied at different positions. Clin Chim Acta 1979; 98: 113–8. 10.1016/0009-8981(79)90171-2Search in Google Scholar

5. Kang HJ, Han CD, Jahng JS, Ko SO. Blood gas and electrolyte changes after tourniquet application in total knee replacement surgery. Yonsei Med J 1992; 33: 153–8. 10.3349/ymj.1992.33.2.153Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. McMullan AD, Burns J, Paterson CR. Venepuncture for calcium assays: should we still avoid the tourniquet? Postgrad Med J 1990; 66: 547–8. 10.1136/pgmj.66.777.547Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Buffington S. Specimen collection and testing. In: Nursing procedures, 2nd ed. Springhouse, PA: Springhouse Corp, 1996:135–8. Search in Google Scholar

8. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135–60. 10.1177/096228029900800204Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Ricos C, Alvarez V, Cava F, Garcia-Lario JV, Hernandez A, Jimenez CV, et al. Current databases on biologicvariation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999; 59: 491–500. 10.1080/00365519950185229Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Young DS. Conveying the importance of the preanalytical phase. Clin Chem Lab Med 2003; 41: 884–7. 10.1515/CCLM.2003.133Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Dittmann M. Blood collection techniques. An informative guide to venous blood collection. Kremsmünster, Austria: Greiner Bio-One GmbH, 2001:1–24. Search in Google Scholar

12. Hill AB, Nahrwold ML, Noonan D, Northrop P. A comparison of methods of blood withdrawal and sample preparation for potassium measurements. Anesthesiology 1980 53: 60–3. 10.1097/00000542-198007000-00012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Plebani M. Towards quality specifications in extra-analytical phases of laboratory activity. Clin Chem Lab Med 2004; 42: 576–7. 10.1515/CCLM.2004.099Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2005-4-7
Accepted: 2005-5-16
Published Online: 2011-9-21
Published in Print: 2005-8-1

©2005 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Downloaded on 23.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2005.146/html
Scroll to top button