Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Present state of and problems with core needle biopsy for non-palpable breast lesions

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The widespread use of screening mammography has resulted in increased detection of nonpalpable breast lesions here in Japan. For the histopathologic work-up of these lesions, stereotactic core biopsy is essential as a minimally invasive diagnostic procedure. However, the number of facilities that provide this procedure cannot keep up with the increasing demand from patients.

Another issue is interpreting the results of the biopsy. With a histological diagnosis using needle samples, there is always a risk of underestimation or a false-negative result. To avoid missing cancers after stereotactic biopsy, it is important to check for sampling errors and for discrepancies between the radiologic and pathologic findings.

We are pushing for the rapid spread of an ideal form of stereotactic breast core biopsy (using prone-type units, digital methods, and vacuum-assisted breast biopsy devices) throughout Japan so that every patient can undergo this examination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CNB:

Core needle biopsy

VAB:

Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy;

US:

Ultrasound

DCIS:

Ductal carcinomain situ

BI-RADS:

Breast imaging reporting and data system

FNAC:

Fine needle aspiration cytology

References

  1. Researches on Quality and Efficacy Improvement of Breast Cancer Screening, Grant-in-aid for Cancer Research supported by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan: Japanese guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening. 2005.

  2. Lieberman L, Gougoutas CA, Zakowski MF, LaTrenta LR, Abramson AF, Morris EA, Dershaw DD: Calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy: Comparison of breast biopsy methods.AJR 177:165–172, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting data system (BI-RADS), 2nd ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mizutani M, Tohyama T, Kamei K, Iwata H: A medical care system for mammographically detected microcalcifications associated with non-palpable breast lesions at Aichi cancer center.J Jpn Assoc Breast Cancer Screen 13:167–175, 2004 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Westenend PJ, Sever AR, Beekman-de Voider HJC, Liem SJ: A comparison of aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in the evaluation of breast lesions.Cancer (Caner Cytopathol) 93:146–150, 2001.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ibrahim AF, Bateman AC, Theaker JM, Low JL, Addis B, Tidbury P, Rubin C, Briley M, Royle GT: The role and histological classification of needle core biopsy in comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology in the preoperative assessment of impalpable breast lesions.J Clin Pathol 54:121–125, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burbank F, Parker SH, Fogarty TJ: Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the Mam-motome.Am Surg 62:738–744, 1996.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ohsumi S, Takashima S, Aogi K, Ishizaki M, Mandai K: Breast biopsy for mammographically detected nonpalpable lesions using a vacuum-assisted biopsy device (Mammotome) and an upright-type stereotactic mammography unit.Jpn J Clin Oncol 31:527–531, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kettritz U, Rotter K, Schreer I, Murauer M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Peter D, Heywang-Kobrunner SH: Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients.Cancer 100:245–251, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pfarl G, Helbich TH, Riedl CC, Wagner T, Gnant M, Rudas M, Lieberman L: Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: A validation study.AJR 179:1503–1507, 2002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shah VI, Raju U, Chitale D, Deshpande V, Gregory Nancy, Strand V: False-negative core needle biopsies of the breast.Cancer 97:1824–1831, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, Evans III WP, Lechner MC, Richardson TR, Smid AA, Borofsky HB, Lee CH, Goldstein HM, Schilling KJ, Wray AB, Brem RF, Helbich TH, Lehrer DE, Adler SJ: Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: Determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates.Radiology 218:497–502, 2001.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Takahashi K: Breast conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in relation to the surgical margin status.Jpn J Breast Cancer 20:79–85, 2005 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Iwase, T., Takahashi, K., Gomi, N. et al. Present state of and problems with core needle biopsy for non-palpable breast lesions. Breast Cancer 13, 32–37 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2325/jbcs.13.32

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2325/jbcs.13.32

Key words

Navigation