REPORT OF THE CASES

In our institute, approximately 10 000 bone marrow biopsies are investigated every year, in many cases together with bone marrow and blood smears. Therefore, from the beginning of computed records in 1989, our archives have included probes of approximately 120 000 haematological patients. Among these records, we found 14 cases of CNL (comparative figure for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), 4597 cases). This “Freiburg collective” of patients with CNL consisted of eight women and six men, 10 of whom died (table 1). The mean age of the patients at diagnosis was 64.7 years (range, 37 to 81). The diagnosis of CNL was established on morphological findings and on clinical and laboratory data. All the patients showed chronic neutrophilia, and most of them had splenomegaly. Clinically, in all the cases an underlying leukaemoid reaction had been ruled out, and a myeloproliferative disorder (mostly: “CML?”) was suspected. Morphologically, the bone marrow was strongly hypercellular because of the expansion of neutrophilic granulopoiesis, which was only slightly left shifted and produced mature neutrophils. Both erythropoiesis and megakaryocytes were normocellular and without cytological abnormalities. The iron load of the phagocytic reticulum cells and the reticulin fibre network was normal. In the blood there was moderate leucocytosis (mean white blood cell count, 45.5 × 10⁶/litre), including up to 95% mature neutrophils and band forms, but often also up to 20% myelocytes. In most of the cases the neutrophil alkaline phosphatase (NAP) score was greatly increased, and mild anaemia and thrombocytopenia were present. In no case was plasma cell dyscrasia found. On investigation of fresh blood samples of the patients taken at the time of diagnosis, no BCR/ABL translocation was detected using standard methods, including fluorescence in situ hybridisation. In the course of the disease, 10 of the patients died, with a mean survival time of 14.7 months. Cerebral haemorrhage (in six cases) was the most important cause of death. Two patients died of generalised leukaemic tissue infiltration, one of them showing ileus caused by a granulocytic and myelocytic infiltration of the small bowel. Another two patients died of pneumonia or after blastic transformation of the disease. Patient 1 is well and free of disease 73 months after familiary allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. The youngest patient (patient 9) has been in clinical remission during 41 months of interferon α treatment. The other patients were treated by blood transfusions when necessary or by hydroxyurea.

DISCUSSION

The main diagnostic criteria of CNL are chronic neutrophilia in the blood, expansion of neutrophilic granulopoiesis in the bone marrow, and splenomegaly in the absence of any form of BCR/ABL translocation or leukaemoid reaction.¹ These criteria were sufficiently fulfilled in our 14 patients with CNL. The spectrum of fatal complications we saw in our patients was very similar to that described in the literature.² The haemorrhagic diathesis seen in patients with CNL may be the result of thrombocytopenia and thrombocyte dysfunction,⁶ or it may be caused by leukaemic infiltration of vascular walls.⁷ With rare exceptions,⁸ CNL is a disease of older adults (fig 1). At the time of diagnosis, 88% of the patients with CNL in the literature were older than 50 years. The sex distribution in CNL is nearly equal.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Figure 1

Distribution of patients with chronic neutrophilic leukaemia in the literature (including the Freiburg cases) according to sex and age.

There is doubt about whether all of the CNL cases in the literature represent true CNL. Some authors^1,2,5 have suggested that those cases of CNL that occurred in association with plasma cell dyscrasias like myeloma were in fact neutrophilic reactions. Moreover, it was suggested that cases of CNL showing dysplastic features would be better classified as a myelodysplastic entity. Thus, reviewing the data of all CNL cases in the literature, Reilly⁵ defined a group of 33 cases of true CNL, including one unpublished case of his own. This group of 33 selected patients with CNL also showed a high mean age (62.5 years) and short survival times (mean survival, 30 months), but had a 2 : 1 male to female ratio. The term true CNL used by Reilly reveals the need for an even more precise definition of CNL as an entity. Thus, the diagnostic criteria of CNL should be applied in a strict manner, especially for the conditions mentioned above.

“To date, because of the rarity of the disease, no therapeutic standard has been determined in chronic neutrophilic leukaemia”

In the differential diagnosis of CNL, patients with CML usually show a higher degree of leucocytosis (white blood cell count, ∼ 170 × 10⁶/litre), with more immature granulopoietic forms, a decreased NAP score, and basophilia.¹ In the bone marrow, granulopoiesis is far more left shifted, and micromegakaryocytes are present. The most important criterion of CML is the presence of a BCR/ABL translocation. There is a rare form of CML (neutrophilic chronic myeloid leukaemia)⁹ that shares some of the morphological features of CNL, but is characterised by an uncommon type of BCR/ABL translocation (BCR e19/ABL a2). Like CNL, leukaemoid reactions are BCR/ABL negative and show identical morphological changes, including raised NAP scores, making a distinction difficult or even impossible. Because CNL is a clonal disorder,¹⁰ clonality studies of the neutrophils in the future may help to distinguish between cells of leukaemic or reactive origin.

To date, because of the rarity of the disease, no therapeutic standard has been determined in CNL.² Chemotherapeutic agents, such as hydroxyurea, may temporarily control leucocytosis and splenomegaly, and the use of interferon α may induce long standing clinical remission.⁴ So far, allogeneic bone marrow transplantation represents the only treatment modality with curative potential.^2,6

We conclude that it is important to recognise CNL as a rare, but distinct, disease entity different from CML, and in particular to distinguish CNL from leukaemoid reactions, because patients with CNL generally have a poor prognosis. To gain a better understanding of the nature of true CNL the reporting of new cases must be encouraged.